Abstract

This study aims to shed light on the
role of the judicial institution of all kinds
in controlling public procurement as it is
an effective control that can justify
imposing penalties, whether financial or
depriving of freedom, unlike the rest of the
types of administrative controls that
depend on reports and administrative
rejections.
Through the description and analysis
of the role of these oversight bodies, the
study concluded the limited oversight of
the administrative judiciary in terms of its
suspension of the dispute case by the
affected economic operator, not to mention
its lack of specialization. , while we
concluded the freedom of the financial
judiciary to exercise its control at any time
and at the level of any organization, and
even its authority to impose financial
restraining and referral to the criminal
judge when necessary.

Information

Item Type:	Journal
Divisions:	» Faculty of Law and Political Sciences
ePrint ID:	4802
Date Deposited:	2024-01-18
Further Information:	Google Scholar
URI:	https://old.univ-soukahras.dz/en/publication/article/4802

BibTex